What does it mean to say a language is endangered?
An
endangered language is one that is likely to become extinct in the near
future. Many languages are failing out of use and being replaced by
others that are more widely used in the region or nation, such as
English in the U.S. or Spanish in Mexico. Unless current trends are
reversed, these endangered languages will become extinct within the next
century. Many other languages are no longer being learned by new
generations of children or by new adult speakers; these languages will
become extinct when their last speaker dies. In fact, dozens of
languages today have only one native speaker still living, and that
person's death will mean the extinction of the language: It will no
longer be spoken, or known, by anyone.
Is that what happened to dead languages like Ancient Greek and Latin?
No.
These languages are considered dead because they are no longer spoken
in the form in which we find them in ancient writings. But they weren't
abruptly replaced by other languages; instead, Ancient Greek slowly
evolved into modern Greek, and Latin slowly evolved into modern Italian,
Spanish, French, Romanian, and other languages. In the same way, the
Middle English of Chaucer's day is no longer spoken, but it has evolved
into Modern English.
How do languages become extinct?
Outright
genocide is one cause of language extinction. For example, when
European invaders exterminated the Tasmanians in the early 19th century,
an unknown number of languages died as well. Far more often, however,
languages become extinct when a community finds itself under pressure to
integrate with a larger or more powerful group. Sometimes the people
learn the outsiders' language in addition to their own; this has
happened in Greenland, a territory of Denmark, where Kalaallisut is
learned alongside Danish. But often the community is pressured to give
up its language and even its ethnic and cultural identity. This has been
the case for the ethnic Kurds in Turkey, who are forbidden by law to
print or formally teach their language. It has also been the case for
younger speakers of Native American languages, who, as recently as the
ig6os, were punished for speaking their native languages at boarding
schools.
Is language extinction sudden or gradual?
Both.
The fate of a language can be changed in a single generation if it is
no longer being learned by children. This has been true for some Yupik
Eskimo communities in Alaska, where just 20 years ago all of the
children spoke Yupik; today the youngest speakers of Yupik in some of
these communities are in their 20s, and the children speak only English.
Likewise, Scots Gaelic was spoken on Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia,
until the 1940s, but by the 1970s the language was no longer being
learned by children. In other cases, languages have declined much more
slowly. Iroquoian languages like Onondaga and Mohawk, spoken in upstate
New York and adjacent parts of Canada, have been declining for over two
centuries; yet they are still spoken today by older adults and, in the
case of Mohawk, some younger people as well.
How many languages are endangered?
According
to one count, 6,703 separate languages were spoken in the world in
1996. Of these, 1000 were spoken in the Americas, 2011 in Africa, 225 in
Europe, 2165 in Asia, and 1320 in the Pacific, including Australia.
These numbers should be taken with a grain of salt, because our
information about many languages is scant or outdated, and it is hard to
draw the line between languages and dialects. But most linguists agree
that there are well over 5,000 languages in the world. A century from
now, however, many of these languages may be extinct. Some linguists
believe the number may decrease by half; some say the total could fall
to mere hundreds as the majority of the world's languages - most spoken
by a few thousand people or less - give way to languages like English,
Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin Chinese, Russian, Indonesian, Arabic,
Swahili, and Hindi. By some estimates, 80% of the world's languages may
vanish within the next century.
Whose languages are endangered?
Although
the endangered languages are spoken by minority communities, these
communities account for most of the world's languages. They include the
tribes of Papua New Guinea, who alone speak as any as 900 languages;
Aboriginal peoples of Australia, over 80% of whose native languages will
die with the current generation; the native peoples of the Americas,
who still retain 90% or so of their languages; the national and tribal
minorities of Africa, Asia, and Oceania, speaking several thousand more
languages; and marginalized European peoples such as the Irish, the
Frisians, the Provençal, and the Basques.
How many North American native languages are endangered?
According
to a recent survey, out of hundreds of languages that were once spoken
in North America, only 194 remain. Of these, 33 are spoken by both
adults and children; another 34 are spoken by adults, but by few
children; 73 are spoken almost entirely by adults over 50; 49 are spoken
only by a few people, mostly over 70; and 5 may have already become
extinct.
The languages that
are not being transmitted to children, or that are being learned by few
children, are endangered and likely to become extinct. In fact, only the
33 languages in the first group seem 'safe.' But most of these are
threatened as well because their speakers live near other communities
where the children speak English. And all native North American groups
are under pressure to give up their native languages and use English
instead. The younger generation feels the pressure especially strongly;
television and movies often send a message that discourages the
maintenance of community values, inviting young viewers to join a more
glamorous and more commercialized world that has no apparent connection
to their native community and its elders and traditions.
Nonetheless,
although a great deal of linguistic heritage is clearly in danger, the
fact that so many Native American languages have survived into the 2lst
century is evidence of the strength of these communities and of the
fundamental value of language to human beings.
What does language extinction mean for a community-and for the rest of us?
When
a community loses its language, it often loses a great deal of its
cultural identity at the same time. Although language loss may be
voluntary or involuntary, it always involves pressure of some kind, and
it is often felt as a loss of social identity or as a symbol of defeat.
That doesn't mean that a group's social identity is always lost when its
language is lost; for example, both the Chumash in California and the
Manx on the Isle of Man have lost their native languages, but not their
identity as Chumash or Manx. But language is a powerful symbol of a
group's identity. Much of the cultural, spiritual, and intellectual life
of a people is experienced through language. This ranges from prayers,
myths, ceremonies, poetry, oratory, and technical vocabulary to everyday
greetings, leave- takings, conversational styles, humor, ways of
speaking to children, and terms for habits, behaviors, and emotions.
When a language is lost, all of this must be refashioned in the new
language-with different words, sounds, and grammar- if it is to be kept
at all. Frequently traditions are abruptly lost in the process and
replaced by the cultural habits of the more powerful group. For these
reasons, among others, it is often very important to the community
itself that its language survive.
Much
is lost from a scientific point of view as well when a language
disappears. A people's history is passed down through its language, so
when the language disappears, it may take with it important information
about the early history of the community. The loss of human languages
also severely limits what linguists can learn about human cognition. By
studying what all of the world's languages have in common, we can find
out what is and isn't possible in a human language. This in turn tells
us important things about the human mind and how it is that children are
able to learn a complex system like language so quickly and easily. The
fewer languages there are to study, the less we will be able to learn
about the human mind.
But wouldn't it be easier if everyone just spoke the same language?
Although
for many people it's important to know a major national or
international language, that doesn't mean they must abandon their mother
tongue. Children who grow up speaking two or more languages learn those
languages just as well as children who grow up speaking only one
language.
What can be done to preserve endangered languages?
A
community that wants to preserve or revive its language has a number of
options. Perhaps the most dramatic story is that of Modern Hebrew,
which was revived as a mother tongue after centuries of being learned
and studied only in its ancient written form. Irish has had considerable
institutional and political support as the national language of
Ireland, despite major inroads by English. In New Zealand, Maori
communities established nursery schools staffed by elders and conducted
entirely in Maori, called kohanga reo, 'language nests'. There, and in
Alaska, Hawaii, and elsewhere, this model is being extended to primary
and in some cases secondary school. And in California, younger adults
have become language apprentices to older adult speakers in communities
where only a few older speakers are still living. A growing number of
conferences, workshops, and publications now offer support for
individuals, schools, and communities trying to preserve languages.
Because
so many languages are in danger of disappearing, linguists are trying
to learn as much about them as possible, so that even if the language
disappears, all knowledge of the language won't disappear at the same
time. Researchers make videotapes, audiotapes, and written records of
language use in both formal and informal settings, along with
translations.
In addition,
they analyze the vocabulary and rules of the language and write
dictionaries and grammars. Linguists also work with communities around
the world that want to preserve their languages, offering both technical
and practical help with language teaching, maintenance, and revival.
This help is based in part on the dictionaries and grammars that they
write. But linguists can help in other ways, too, using their experience
in teaching and studying a wide variety of languages. They can use what
they've learned about other endangered languages to help a community
preserve its own language, and they can take advantage of the latest
technology for recording and studying languages.
Are new languages being born to replace the languages that die?
Yes.
Many signed languages, including American Sign Language, have been born
within the last few centuries. Tok Pisin, the national language of
Papua New Guinea, developed from an English- based pidgin (a blend of
two or more languages). And over many centuries, different dialects of a
single language can grow to be distinct languages in their own right,
just as dialects of Latin developed into French, Italian, and so on.
But
these new languages do not compare to the linguistic heritage that is
being lost. The thousands of languages spoken in the world today have
evolved over the entire course of human history. Every group of related
languages is separated from every other group by at least 5000 years of
development, usually more. If English were to become the sole language
of every person on earth, it would take tens of thousands of years to
produce anything like the diversity that is our heritage-assuming we
could somehow reproduce the conditions under which this diversity grew.
For all practical purposes, the diversity we have now is absolutely
irreplaceable.
No comments:
Post a Comment